Playwright suites over the journeys that actually earn money, kept small enough to stay fast and stable.
Checks wired into pull requests with clear ownership, so a red build is a decision point rather than background noise.
Graded evaluation sets, structural assertions and drift monitoring for features whose output is never identical twice.
Performance baselines and failure injection for the paths that must hold up during your busiest hour.
Short cycles, visible progress and a scope you can change. You see working software every week rather than a status report.
The repository, the infrastructure code and the documentation. In your accounts, under your licence, from the first commit.
Where failures would cost most, what is covered today, and which existing tests are worth keeping.
Highest-value journeys automated first, running in CI from the beginning.
Flake hunted down properly, with test data and environments made repeatable.
Your developers extend the suite as a habit, with patterns and documentation that make that easy.
Enough that the paths carrying revenue and risk are protected. Chasing a percentage produces slow suites and false confidence.
Yes. Evaluation sets with graders, plus assertions on structure, citations and refusal behaviour rather than exact wording.
No. We build the automation and the practices, and the team keeps ownership with far less manual repetition.
We triage them. Some get fixed, some get deleted, and we are direct about which is which.